Philosophy
I think a lot about ghosts.
Not the supernatural kind, but the ones that animate our systems - the ineffable something that makes an organization more than its org chart, a brain more than its neurons, a society more than its infrastructure. That ghost in the machine that emerges from complexity but can't be reduced to its parts.
In dry stone masonry, there's a quality of the constructed wall that is more than the individual stones selected, more than the placement and gravity that binds the wall's form together, and more than the finished form's appearance and function. Built into the wall is something ethereal - the human effort, the sweat and blood, the energy of the life that labored for the wall's creation. Those who appreciate dry stone walling as an artform can sense these stories, written in stone.
The world as influenced by human minds and hands is permeated with this laborious energy of creation. Everywhere we turn, and especially within our social constructs, we are influenced by the spirit of the world we have created. We are able to sense the gestalt of our built environment, and we operate within this understanding of the whole of things.
Maybe it's all the sci-fi I read as a kid, but I've always sensed these “ghosts.” I’ve watched them move through systems like wind dancing through the leaves of trees. I’ve reached out and touched institutional knowledge flowing through an organization's unofficial channels. I’ve been absorbed into a team's dynamic shift when welcoming new team members. I’ve tangled with the emergent behaviors of our digital systems that surprise even their creators.
Our tools aren't just extending our capabilities anymore; they're becoming partners in creation. The ghosts in our machines are starting to talk back.
Intelligent automation isn't merely changing our tools and workflows—it's reshaping the underlying assumptions and structures upon which our society is built. Our social constructs evolved in an environment where certain cognitive tasks were exclusively human domains. As AI systems take on these tasks, we are forced to reconsider basic questions about work, knowledge, expertise, decision-making authority, and even what it means to be human.
This transformation is irrevocable. Once certain technological capabilities exist, societies reorganize around them in ways that make reversal practically impossible—similar to how we couldn't revert to pre-internet social structures even if we wanted to.
The Great Transformation
Consider how automation is transforming our world at its foundations:
Knowledge hierarchies: Traditional expertise required years of human learning and practice. When AI systems can instantly access and process vast information repositories, the nature of expertise itself changes. We must now distinguish between mere information access and the contextual understanding that comes from lived experience – creating new relationships between human wisdom and machine knowledge.
Institutional structures: Organizations built around human information processing capabilities must now adapt to hybrid human-AI systems with different strengths and limitations. These aren't simply automated versions of old structures but fundamentally new collaborative systems that must respect both algorithmic efficiency and human judgment.
Decision-making frameworks: Our governance models assume human judgment at critical decision points. As AI systems participate in or influence these decisions, we must reconsider accountability and authority. This requires creating frameworks that maintain human oversight while benefiting from computational insights – a delicate balance of augmentation without abdicating responsibility.
Cultural conceptions of work: Our identities, status systems, and economic models are deeply tied to human labor. Automation challenges these fundamental social organizing principles. We must reimagine what meaningful contribution looks like when routine tasks are increasingly handled by machines.
Power distributions: Access to and control of intelligent automation creates new dynamics that reshape existing power structures. We have a responsibility to ensure these technologies democratize capability rather than concentrate power – making deliberate choices about who benefits and who decides.
Governance and Alignment
The technical capabilities of AI systems advance daily, but their integration into our human systems requires thoughtful governance. In my work, I've learned that effective AI governance isn't about restrictive limitations—it's about intentional, ethical design that extends human capability while reflecting human values.
This means creating systems with:
Meaningful transparency appropriate to their context and impacts
Clear boundaries between augmentation and delegation
Inclusive development processes that represent diverse perspectives
Robust feedback mechanisms that allow learning from both successes and failures
Structured oversight that maintains human judgment in consequential decisions
True alignment between AI systems and human intentions requires more than technical safeguards. It demands ongoing dialogue about values, continuous assessment of impacts, and adaptive governance that evolves with technological capability. The ghost and the machine must develop in harmony.
Balancing the Ghost and the Machine
Through my work establishing AI programs in government systems, I've witnessed how these ghosts manifest in organizations where the stakes involve not just operational success, but public trust and societal impact. True digital evolution requires more than technical expertise—it demands an understanding of human systems, organizational dynamics, and the subtle interplay between tradition and innovation.
I believe successful AI integration isn't merely about implementing new technologies—it's about orchestrating a delicate balance through three core principles:
-
Technology should enhance human capability rather than replace human judgment. This requires designing systems that complement human strengths while addressing limitations. In practice, this means creating collaborative workflows where AI handles information processing while humans provide contextual understanding and value judgments.
-
The benefits and control of AI systems must be broadly shared. In government contexts, this means ensuring technological evolution serves democratic values through transparent processes, equitable access, and public engagement. I've implemented stakeholder councils, impact assessments, and feedback mechanisms to ensure diverse perspectives shape system development.
-
Organizations must develop the capacity to continuously learn and evolve alongside technological change. This requires building not just technical infrastructure but also learning systems that capture insights, evaluate outcomes, and adjust approaches based on real-world experience.
We must honor the institutional knowledge built over decades while embracing the transformative potential of AI. We must design systems that aren't just technically sophisticated but also deeply aligned with human flourishing.
In this landscape of digital transformation, we stand at a crucial intersection where technology and human potential converge. The question isn't whether these changes will happen—they're already unfolding. The question is how we navigate them with wisdom, with humanity, with an appreciation for both the ghosts and the machines they inhabit.
Continuing the Conversation
These reflections aren't simply abstract musings—they're the foundation of practical work in organizations navigating transformation. My perspective has been shaped by experiences across institutions grappling with these very questions, and it continues to evolve through dialogue with others on similar journeys.
If these ideas resonate with you, I invite you to explore them further through the articles and frameworks shared throughout this site. Each piece examines different dimensions of this transformation—from organizational intelligence to leadership evolution to the human experience of change.
For those facing similar challenges in their own organizations, I welcome the opportunity to connect. Whether you're looking to discuss specific transformation initiatives, explore collaborative possibilities, or simply share perspectives on our changing landscape, reach out through the contact page.
The conversations we have about these changes are not separate from the changes themselves—they're part of how we collectively shape them. By bringing diverse perspectives and experiences together, we can navigate this transformation with greater wisdom and intention.
The ghosts in our systems await our dialogue.
Learn about how my philosophy and principles guide my practical work across business process reengineering, systems design, data architecture, and AI implementation.